| Civilising Cities: Preliminary Findings from Billingshurst
1 Overview
The Billingshurst project was included to identify the quality
of life changes resulting from a package of predominantly road-based
measures, which have significantly reduced traffic in the centre
of this large village. A bypass was opened in September 1999 and
a programme of traffic calming measures and village centre streetscape
enhancements is being implemented between April and September
2002. Under the research, a retrospective quality of life evaluation
of the bypass is being conducted and a ‘before and after’ study
is being carried out around the introduction of the traffic calming
proposals. (It was not possible to select an example of a bypass
construction around which a standard ‘before’ and ‘after’ study
could be conducted, because there were no appropriate schemes
due for completion within the timeframe of the Civilising Cities
research.)
The transport changes are linked to a significant house-building
programme, in which 550 new houses are being built in the west
of the Village. Through selling land to property developers for
these new houses, the local District Council of Horsham was able
to fund the entire transport package along with a range of community
facility improvements to, in part, meet the needs of the increased
population.
After the opening of the bypass, traffic travelling North/South
through the village (in the same direction as the bypass) reduced
by approximately 40% to around 10,000 vehicles per 24-hour period.
However, traffic travelling along the A272 East/West route increased
by just over 10% to 6200 vehicles per day, although has since
started to decline. The traffic calming measures should address
some of the persistent problems of through traffic that the bypass
did not completely solve and they should help to control the growing
internal traffic from residential households. They should also
helping to maintain the attractiveness of the High Street area
to residents and visitors.
Long-term residents in the village are worried about the adverse
affects of the increased number of households, which they see
as changing the nature of the village. It has been recognised
that transport measures are one of the key sets of interventions
to help it maintain its character.
2 Description of local study areas
Figure 1 shows the route of the 2.46km single carriageway bypass
and the position of the village within Horsham District. As can
be seen, the village has also been divided into local study areas,
based on proximity to the traffic changes. They are called: Near
bypass, Near High Street, Peripheral roads, New housing and Elsewhere
(which is not expected to experience significant changes during
the course of the research).
The Village has a residential population of approximately 5000
people (estimated for the year 2000) compared to a Billingshurst
Ward population estimate of 6600 people. There were approximately
2200 households in Billingshust Village in 2002. The ward itself
is in the top 15% of least deprived wards in England, based in
the Index of Deprivation. This is reflected in below average unemployment,
and high house and car ownership — 84% of households in Billingshurst
Ward own a car compared to the national average of 68% (1991 Census).
Figure 1: Billingshurst
3 Programme of improvements
Under the traffic calming project, five traffic calming gateways
were constructed at the main entrances to the village under Phase
1 of the project in Autumn 2000. The most significant traffic
calming measures, though, will be implemented in Phase 2, which
commenced in Spring 2002 and will take 6 months to complete. Phase
2 involves making the High Street more pedestrian friendly and
changing the priority of traffic using the A272. At present, traffic
using the A272 gives way to traffic using the High Street. This
will be changed so that traffic on the A272 will have priority
and High Street traffic will give way. This will add an extra
delay to traffic travelling through the village North to South.
In addition, crossing facilities will be improved to develop a
village walkway.
Amongst community facilities, new playing fields are to be built
on the Western (non-village) side of the bypass (in 2002). A swimming
pool is to be built (likely to be 2003). A £100,000 extension
to the Village Hall is to be built by Spring 2002. A village bus
service is planned for 2003, which will travel around Billingshurst
in a circular route.
4 Data collection and analytical approach
In addition to using existing data sources, an extensive household
survey has been conducted in Billingshurst Village, which achieved
a sample of over 50% of households. In order to obtain more information
on impacts on local economic conditions and the quality of the
High Street, from the perspective of both businesses and visitors,
supplementary business and on-street surveys have also been conducted.
The sample sizes for all surveys are shown in Table 1, alongside
the number of respondents that were able to comment on conditions
before and after the construction of the bypass. Table 2 provides
a geographical breakdown of the household sample by study areas
(which are described in Chapter 2). Survey work was carried out
in March 2002, prior to the implementation of the main traffic
calming and High Street enhancement measures. The surveys will
be repeated in 2003, after the traffic calming and village centre
enhancements have been implemented. Meanwhile, extra traffic and
environmental monitoring is being undertaken for the Civilising
Cities initiative by West Sussex County Council.
Table 1: Billingshurst survey sample sizes
Table 2: Billingshurst household sample by local study areas
In order to demonstrate the possible contribution of transport
measures to quality of life in Billingshurst, a series of illustrations
have been used, which compare indicators by geographical area.
Some of these illustrations are simple charts that show a net
percentage value (e.g. % percent satisfied minus % dissatisfied)
by geographical area; others are simple graphs which show a how
a single value changes over time (e.g. traffic flows) by area.
However, it has often been necessary to use a more complex type
of chart, when interpreting findings from the retrospective bypass
survey. By geographical area, this chart type compares:
1. the percentage of respondents noticing changes after the bypass
opened (whether or not the change was an improvement or a worsening)
— in order to gauge the extent of awareness of an impact that
is associated with the bypass;
2. the net percentage of respondents noticing improvements after
the bypass opened (% noticing improvements minus percent noticing
worsening conditions) — in order to assess the direction and degree
of perceived changes;
3. the net percentage of respondents satisfied with current conditions
— in order to measure the absolute level of satisfaction currently.
5 Traffic-related changes
Figure 2 shows traffic and air pollution levels recorded before
and after the opening of the bypass, and it shows perceptions
of changes in noise levels from the household survey. As can be
seen, traffic was reduced by approximately 40% on the High Street
after the opening, and this reduction has been maintained against
a background of increasing traffic approaching the village on
the A29. Although traffic travelling along the A272 East/West
route was shown to increase by approximately 10% after the bypass
opened, it has since reduced to levels prior to opening.
Carbon monoxide monitoring has recorded an increase after the
opening, which is indicated by a ‘warning’ symbol in the Figure.
However, the amount of this pollutant is well within the nationally
recommended maximum. This increase could be due to the measurement
site being close to the A272 East/West route on which traffic
increased slightly. Also this air pollution count should be treated
with caution because only one counter was used.
Noise levels, have been reported as reducing significantly by
household survey respondents living close to the High Street and
its peripheral roads. Small improvements have also been noted
around the rail station, elsewhere in the village. As would be
expected, respondents living close to the bypass have reported
worsening traffic noise, as have the small number of households
in the new housing study area with experience of conditions prior
to the bypass.
Figure 2: Traffic and air pollution changes and perceived noise
reduction
Chart 1 shows household survey perceptions of noise changes,
alongside those for changes in traffic and air pollution. Perceptions
of traffic changes match the count information; meanwhile, perceptions
of air quality show a marked improvement along the High Street,
in contrast to the carbon monoxide counts (which only represent
one aspect of air pollution).
Chart 1: Net satisfaction that traffic, nosie and air pollution
improved after the bypass opened
(N.B. *New housing area responses less than 20)
6 Impact on local economy and accessibility
Preliminary analyses indicate a mixed picture regarding the impact
of the bypass on a range of factors affecting the attractiveness
of the village centre, as shown in Chart 2. Most respondents from
the on-street survey did not notice any significant changes after
the bypass opened in the appearance of the High Street, the attractiveness
of shops to customers, access by foot and access by car. It is
only with respect to road safety that the majority perceived an
impact. Of the people noticing change, there was a net satisfaction
that all the former aspects had improved apart from the ability
of shops to attract customers. The largest improvement was for
road safety (+51%). Although, the indicator for change in the
attractiveness of shops shows a small negative change, it should
be noted that current net satisfaction levels are also relatively
low (at +37%). Similar perceptions were also recorded in the household
survey.
Chart 2: On-street survey results for the impact of the bypass
on the centre of Billingshurst
Evidence from local economic counts of businesses and employment
in the village is shown in Chart 3 and Chart 4, respectively.
The number of businesses in Billingshurst Ward has continued to
rise faster than numbers in Horsham District and in the South
East Region. However, this growth is not reflected in the retail
and hotel/restaurant sectors. Despite the rise in the number of
businesses, the amount of employment in the ward has dipped due,
to the growth in small businesses at the expense of larger employers.
Chart 3: Ward-level business counts in Billingshurst
Chart 4: Ward-level employment counts in Billingshurst
A summary of some the results from the business survey is shown
in Chart 5 and confirm this mixed picture, in which the bypass
has contributed to small changes. The business survey sample comprised,
in the main, businesses from the retail and hotel/restaurant sectors.
Of those that perceived change, more reported that customer numbers
decreased than increased, while conversely more reported that
turnover increased than decreased. This might reflect a drop in
passing trade, where people stop for small items such as newspapers,
but indicate that businesses have maintained trade for larger
items, for which people are prepared to make a special trip to
the village centre.
Chart 5: Impacts of the Billingshurst bypass on business
So far, the analysis has not taken take into account the size
of changes in customer numbers and turnover, which will be studied
in subsequent stages. However, in agreement with the on-street
survey, the majority of respondents did not notice any change
after the bypass opened.
7 Wider quality of life impacts
Chart 6 shows evidence from the household survey for the wider
quality of life impacts in the local study areas, except the new
housing area where the sample is small. In the area close to the
High Street, net percentages of respondents reported noticing
improvements in the ‘neighbourhood as a place to live’ and in
road safety; but they noticed worsening street cleanliness and
antisocial behaviour. Although many respondents did not notice
changes at all, the proportions noticing change are considerably
greater than for changes in the aspects of local economy in Chart
2, except for street cleanliness. Therefore, there is evidence,
in the short term at least, that the bypass has contributed more
significantly to changing wider quality of life issues than to
the local economy and accessibility.
Chart 6: Impacts of the bypass on wider quality of life issues
by study area
Near to the bypass, more people perceived that quality of life
aspects had deteriorated, except for road safety. There is also
evidence that the bypass has made a significant contribution to
worsening overall neighbourhood conditions and anti-social behaviour
problems, based on the numbers noticing change. On the peripheral
roads and around the rail station, as could be expected, changes
are not as pronounced. In subsequent analyses, some of information
from the Billingshurst surveys should be able to be compared against
findings from other surveys conducted in the District and in West
Sussex County. This will show how changes in quality of life being
perceived in Billingshurst compare with those elsewhere in the
region.
Comments to open questions in the household survey have also
been analysed to further explore the importance of these quality
of life issues and to identify other issues. In the analysis,
comments were weighted so only one comment has been recorded for
each of the respondents in each of the categories. Thus, a respondent
that writes many separate comments on crime problems, for example,
is only recorded once.
A summary of comments is shown in Chart 7. In agreement with
other evidence, crime and fear of crime represent the most significant
set of concerns, but respondents are also worried by lack of local
facilities and recent housing growth. There were less comments
on transport problems, though, still a significant number.
Chart 7: Summary of comments
This evidence shows that the contribution of the package of transport
measures to improving quality of life in Billingshurst needs to
be set against other issues; in particular, housing growth, which
is known to be increasing at a faster rate in Billingshurst than
elsewhere. It is hoped that these issues can be more thoroughly
explored, following the successful implementation of the remaining
parts of the transport package and after another round of the
Civilising Cities surveys.
Acknowledgement
The household, on-street and business surveys were part-funded
by a grant from the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund, which we gratefully
acknowledge.
|