| Civilising
Cities: Preliminary Findings from Billingshurst
1 Overview
The Billingshurst project was included to identify the quality
of life changes resulting from a package of predominantly
road-based measures, which have significantly reduced traffic
in the centre of this large village. A bypass was opened
in September 1999 and a programme of traffic calming measures
and village centre streetscape enhancements is being implemented
between April and September 2002. Under the research, a
retrospective quality of life evaluation of the bypass is
being conducted and a ‘before and after’ study is being
carried out around the introduction of the traffic calming
proposals. (It was not possible to select an example of
a bypass construction around which a standard ‘before’ and
‘after’ study could be conducted, because there were no
appropriate schemes due for completion within the timeframe
of the Civilising Cities research.)
The transport changes are linked to a significant house-building
programme, in which 550 new houses are being built in the
west of the Village. Through selling land to property developers
for these new houses, the local District Council of Horsham
was able to fund the entire transport package along with
a range of community facility improvements to, in part,
meet the needs of the increased population.
After the opening of the bypass, traffic travelling North/South
through the village (in the same direction as the bypass)
reduced by approximately 40% to around 10,000 vehicles per
24-hour period. However, traffic travelling along the A272
East/West route increased by just over 10% to 6200 vehicles
per day, although has since started to decline. The traffic
calming measures should address some of the persistent problems
of through traffic that the bypass did not completely solve
and they should help to control the growing internal traffic
from residential households. They should also helping to
maintain the attractiveness of the High Street area to residents
and visitors.
Long-term residents in the village are worried about the
adverse affects of the increased number of households, which
they see as changing the nature of the village. It has been
recognised that transport measures are one of the key sets
of interventions to help it maintain its character.
2 Description of local study areas
Figure 1 shows the route of the 2.46km single carriageway
bypass and the position of the village within Horsham District.
As can be seen, the village has also been divided into local
study areas, based on proximity to the traffic changes.
They are called: Near bypass, Near High Street, Peripheral
roads, New housing and Elsewhere (which is not expected
to experience significant changes during the course of the
research).
The Village has a residential population of approximately
5000 people (estimated for the year 2000) compared to a
Billingshurst Ward population estimate of 6600 people. There
were approximately 2200 households in Billingshust Village
in 2002. The ward itself is in the top 15% of least deprived
wards in England, based in the Index of Deprivation. This
is reflected in below average unemployment, and high house
and car ownership — 84% of households in Billingshurst Ward
own a car compared to the national average of 68% (1991
Census).
Figure 1: Billingshurst
3 Programme of improvements
Under the traffic calming project, five traffic calming
gateways were constructed at the main entrances to the village
under Phase 1 of the project in Autumn 2000. The most significant
traffic calming measures, though, will be implemented in
Phase 2, which commenced in Spring 2002 and will take 6
months to complete. Phase 2 involves making the High Street
more pedestrian friendly and changing the priority of traffic
using the A272. At present, traffic using the A272 gives
way to traffic using the High Street. This will be changed
so that traffic on the A272 will have priority and High
Street traffic will give way. This will add an extra delay
to traffic travelling through the village North to South.
In addition, crossing facilities will be improved to develop
a village walkway.
Amongst community facilities, new playing fields are to
be built on the Western (non-village) side of the bypass
(in 2002). A swimming pool is to be built (likely to be
2003). A £100,000 extension to the Village Hall is
to be built by Spring 2002. A village bus service is planned
for 2003, which will travel around Billingshurst in a circular
route.
4 Data collection and analytical approach
In addition to using existing data sources, an extensive
household survey has been conducted in Billingshurst Village,
which achieved a sample of over 50% of households. In order
to obtain more information on impacts on local economic
conditions and the quality of the High Street, from the
perspective of both businesses and visitors, supplementary
business and on-street surveys have also been conducted.
The sample sizes for all surveys are shown in Table 1,
alongside the number of respondents that were able to comment
on conditions before and after the construction of the bypass.
Table 2 provides a geographical breakdown of the household
sample by study areas (which are described in Chapter 2).
Survey work was carried out in March 2002, prior to the
implementation of the main traffic calming and High Street
enhancement measures. The surveys will be repeated in 2003,
after the traffic calming and village centre enhancements
have been implemented. Meanwhile, extra traffic and environmental
monitoring is being undertaken for the Civilising Cities
initiative by West Sussex County Council.
Table 1: Billingshurst survey sample sizes
Table 2: Billingshurst household sample by local study areas
In order to demonstrate the possible contribution of transport
measures to quality of life in Billingshurst, a series of
illustrations have been used, which compare indicators by
geographical area. Some of these illustrations are simple
charts that show a net percentage value (e.g. % percent
satisfied minus % dissatisfied) by geographical area; others
are simple graphs which show a how a single value changes
over time (e.g. traffic flows) by area.
However, it has often been necessary to use a more complex
type of chart, when interpreting findings from the retrospective
bypass survey. By geographical area, this chart type compares:
1. the percentage of respondents noticing changes after
the bypass opened (whether or not the change was an improvement
or a worsening) — in order to gauge the extent of awareness
of an impact that is associated with the bypass;
2. the net percentage of respondents noticing improvements
after the bypass opened (% noticing improvements minus percent
noticing worsening conditions) — in order to assess the
direction and degree of perceived changes;
3. the net percentage of respondents satisfied with current
conditions — in order to measure the absolute level of satisfaction
currently.
5 Traffic-related changes
Figure 2 shows traffic and air pollution levels recorded
before and after the opening of the bypass, and it shows
perceptions of changes in noise levels from the household
survey. As can be seen, traffic was reduced by approximately
40% on the High Street after the opening, and this reduction
has been maintained against a background of increasing traffic
approaching the village on the A29. Although traffic travelling
along the A272 East/West route was shown to increase by
approximately 10% after the bypass opened, it has since
reduced to levels prior to opening.
Carbon monoxide monitoring has recorded an increase after
the opening, which is indicated by a ‘warning’ symbol in
the Figure. However, the amount of this pollutant is well
within the nationally recommended maximum. This increase
could be due to the measurement site being close to the
A272 East/West route on which traffic increased slightly.
Also this air pollution count should be treated with caution
because only one counter was used.
Noise levels, have been reported as reducing significantly
by household survey respondents living close to the High
Street and its peripheral roads. Small improvements have
also been noted around the rail station, elsewhere in the
village. As would be expected, respondents living close
to the bypass have reported worsening traffic noise, as
have the small number of households in the new housing study
area with experience of conditions prior to the bypass.
Figure 2: Traffic and air pollution changes and perceived
noise reduction
Chart 1 shows household survey perceptions of noise changes,
alongside those for changes in traffic and air pollution.
Perceptions of traffic changes match the count information;
meanwhile, perceptions of air quality show a marked improvement
along the High Street, in contrast to the carbon monoxide
counts (which only represent one aspect of air pollution).
Chart 1: Net satisfaction that traffic, nosie and air pollution
improved after the bypass opened
(N.B. *New housing area responses less than 20)
6 Impact on local economy and accessibility
Preliminary analyses indicate a mixed picture regarding
the impact of the bypass on a range of factors affecting
the attractiveness of the village centre, as shown in Chart
2. Most respondents from the on-street survey did not notice
any significant changes after the bypass opened in the appearance
of the High Street, the attractiveness of shops to customers,
access by foot and access by car. It is only with respect
to road safety that the majority perceived an impact. Of
the people noticing change, there was a net satisfaction
that all the former aspects had improved apart from the
ability of shops to attract customers. The largest improvement
was for road safety (+51%). Although, the indicator for
change in the attractiveness of shops shows a small negative
change, it should be noted that current net satisfaction
levels are also relatively low (at +37%). Similar perceptions
were also recorded in the household survey.
Chart 2: On-street survey results for the impact of the
bypass on the centre of Billingshurst
Evidence from local economic counts of businesses and employment
in the village is shown in Chart 3 and Chart 4, respectively.
The number of businesses in Billingshurst Ward has continued
to rise faster than numbers in Horsham District and in the
South East Region. However, this growth is not reflected
in the retail and hotel/restaurant sectors. Despite the
rise in the number of businesses, the amount of employment
in the ward has dipped due, to the growth in small businesses
at the expense of larger employers.
Chart 3: Ward-level business counts in Billingshurst
Chart 4: Ward-level employment counts in Billingshurst
A summary of some the results from the business survey
is shown in Chart 5 and confirm this mixed picture, in which
the bypass has contributed to small changes. The business
survey sample comprised, in the main, businesses from the
retail and hotel/restaurant sectors. Of those that perceived
change, more reported that customer numbers decreased than
increased, while conversely more reported that turnover
increased than decreased. This might reflect a drop in passing
trade, where people stop for small items such as newspapers,
but indicate that businesses have maintained trade for larger
items, for which people are prepared to make a special trip
to the village centre.
Chart 5: Impacts of the Billingshurst bypass on business
So far, the analysis has not taken take into account the
size of changes in customer numbers and turnover, which
will be studied in subsequent stages. However, in agreement
with the on-street survey, the majority of respondents did
not notice any change after the bypass opened.
7 Wider quality of life impacts
Chart 6 shows evidence from the household survey for the
wider quality of life impacts in the local study areas,
except the new housing area where the sample is small. In
the area close to the High Street, net percentages of respondents
reported noticing improvements in the ‘neighbourhood as
a place to live’ and in road safety; but they noticed worsening
street cleanliness and antisocial behaviour. Although many
respondents did not notice changes at all, the proportions
noticing change are considerably greater than for changes
in the aspects of local economy in Chart 2, except for street
cleanliness. Therefore, there is evidence, in the short
term at least, that the bypass has contributed more significantly
to changing wider quality of life issues than to the local
economy and accessibility.
Chart 6: Impacts of the bypass on wider quality of life
issues by study area
Near to the bypass, more people perceived that quality
of life aspects had deteriorated, except for road safety.
There is also evidence that the bypass has made a significant
contribution to worsening overall neighbourhood conditions
and anti-social behaviour problems, based on the numbers
noticing change. On the peripheral roads and around the
rail station, as could be expected, changes are not as pronounced.
In subsequent analyses, some of information from the Billingshurst
surveys should be able to be compared against findings from
other surveys conducted in the District and in West Sussex
County. This will show how changes in quality of life being
perceived in Billingshurst compare with those elsewhere
in the region.
Comments to open questions in the household survey have
also been analysed to further explore the importance of
these quality of life issues and to identify other issues.
In the analysis, comments were weighted so only one comment
has been recorded for each of the respondents in each of
the categories. Thus, a respondent that writes many separate
comments on crime problems, for example, is only recorded
once.
A summary of comments is shown in Chart 7. In agreement
with other evidence, crime and fear of crime represent the
most significant set of concerns, but respondents are also
worried by lack of local facilities and recent housing growth.
There were less comments on transport problems, though,
still a significant number.
Chart 7: Summary of comments
This evidence shows that the contribution of the package
of transport measures to improving quality of life in Billingshurst
needs to be set against other issues; in particular, housing
growth, which is known to be increasing at a faster rate
in Billingshurst than elsewhere. It is hoped that these
issues can be more thoroughly explored, following the successful
implementation of the remaining parts of the transport package
and after another round of the Civilising Cities surveys.
Acknowledgement
The household, on-street and business surveys were part-funded
by a grant from the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund, which we gratefully
acknowledge.
|