| Civilising
Cities: Preliminary Findings from Billingshurst
1 Overview
The Billingshurst project was included to identify
the quality of life changes resulting from a
package of predominantly road-based measures,
which have significantly reduced traffic in
the centre of this large village. A bypass was
opened in September 1999 and a programme of
traffic calming measures and village centre
streetscape enhancements is being implemented
between April and September 2002. Under the
research, a retrospective quality of life evaluation
of the bypass is being conducted and a ‘before
and after’ study is being carried out around
the introduction of the traffic calming proposals.
(It was not possible to select an example of
a bypass construction around which a standard
‘before’ and ‘after’ study could be conducted,
because there were no appropriate schemes due
for completion within the timeframe of the Civilising
Cities research.)
The transport changes are linked to a significant
house-building programme, in which 550 new houses
are being built in the west of the Village.
Through selling land to property developers
for these new houses, the local District Council
of Horsham was able to fund the entire transport
package along with a range of community facility
improvements to, in part, meet the needs of
the increased population.
After the opening of the bypass, traffic travelling
North/South through the village (in the same
direction as the bypass) reduced by approximately
40% to around 10,000 vehicles per 24-hour period.
However, traffic travelling along the A272 East/West
route increased by just over 10% to 6200 vehicles
per day, although has since started to decline.
The traffic calming measures should address
some of the persistent problems of through traffic
that the bypass did not completely solve and
they should help to control the growing internal
traffic from residential households. They should
also helping to maintain the attractiveness
of the High Street area to residents and visitors.
Long-term residents in the village are worried
about the adverse affects of the increased number
of households, which they see as changing the
nature of the village. It has been recognised
that transport measures are one of the key sets
of interventions to help it maintain its character.
2 Description of local study areas
Figure 1 shows the route of the 2.46km single
carriageway bypass and the position of the village
within Horsham District. As can be seen, the
village has also been divided into local study
areas, based on proximity to the traffic changes.
They are called: Near bypass, Near High Street,
Peripheral roads, New housing and Elsewhere
(which is not expected to experience significant
changes during the course of the research).
The Village has a residential population of
approximately 5000 people (estimated for the
year 2000) compared to a Billingshurst Ward
population estimate of 6600 people. There were
approximately 2200 households in Billingshust
Village in 2002. The ward itself is in the top
15% of least deprived wards in England, based
in the Index of Deprivation. This is reflected
in below average unemployment, and high house
and car ownership — 84% of households in Billingshurst
Ward own a car compared to the national average
of 68% (1991 Census).
Figure 1: Billingshurst
3 Programme of improvements
Under the traffic calming project, five traffic
calming gateways were constructed at the main
entrances to the village under Phase 1 of the
project in Autumn 2000. The most significant
traffic calming measures, though, will be implemented
in Phase 2, which commenced in Spring 2002 and
will take 6 months to complete. Phase 2 involves
making the High Street more pedestrian friendly
and changing the priority of traffic using the
A272. At present, traffic using the A272 gives
way to traffic using the High Street. This will
be changed so that traffic on the A272 will
have priority and High Street traffic will give
way. This will add an extra delay to traffic
travelling through the village North to South.
In addition, crossing facilities will be improved
to develop a village walkway.
Amongst community facilities, new playing fields
are to be built on the Western (non-village)
side of the bypass (in 2002). A swimming pool
is to be built (likely to be 2003). A £100,000
extension to the Village Hall is to be built
by Spring 2002. A village bus service is planned
for 2003, which will travel around Billingshurst
in a circular route.
4 Data collection and analytical approach
In addition to using existing data sources,
an extensive household survey has been conducted
in Billingshurst Village, which achieved a sample
of over 50% of households. In order to obtain
more information on impacts on local economic
conditions and the quality of the High Street,
from the perspective of both businesses and
visitors, supplementary business and on-street
surveys have also been conducted.
The sample sizes for all surveys are shown
in Table 1, alongside the number of respondents
that were able to comment on conditions before
and after the construction of the bypass. Table
2 provides a geographical breakdown of the household
sample by study areas (which are described in
Chapter 2). Survey work was carried out in March
2002, prior to the implementation of the main
traffic calming and High Street enhancement
measures. The surveys will be repeated in 2003,
after the traffic calming and village centre
enhancements have been implemented. Meanwhile,
extra traffic and environmental monitoring is
being undertaken for the Civilising Cities initiative
by West Sussex County Council.
Table 1: Billingshurst survey sample sizes
Table 2: Billingshurst household sample by local
study areas
In order to demonstrate the possible contribution
of transport measures to quality of life in
Billingshurst, a series of illustrations have
been used, which compare indicators by geographical
area. Some of these illustrations are simple
charts that show a net percentage value (e.g.
% percent satisfied minus % dissatisfied) by
geographical area; others are simple graphs
which show a how a single value changes over
time (e.g. traffic flows) by area.
However, it has often been necessary to use
a more complex type of chart, when interpreting
findings from the retrospective bypass survey.
By geographical area, this chart type compares:
1. the percentage of respondents noticing changes
after the bypass opened (whether or not the
change was an improvement or a worsening) —
in order to gauge the extent of awareness of
an impact that is associated with the bypass;
2. the net percentage of respondents noticing
improvements after the bypass opened (% noticing
improvements minus percent noticing worsening
conditions) — in order to assess the direction
and degree of perceived changes;
3. the net percentage of respondents satisfied
with current conditions — in order to measure
the absolute level of satisfaction currently.
5 Traffic-related changes
Figure 2 shows traffic and air pollution levels
recorded before and after the opening of the
bypass, and it shows perceptions of changes
in noise levels from the household survey. As
can be seen, traffic was reduced by approximately
40% on the High Street after the opening, and
this reduction has been maintained against a
background of increasing traffic approaching
the village on the A29. Although traffic travelling
along the A272 East/West route was shown to
increase by approximately 10% after the bypass
opened, it has since reduced to levels prior
to opening.
Carbon monoxide monitoring has recorded an
increase after the opening, which is indicated
by a ‘warning’ symbol in the Figure. However,
the amount of this pollutant is well within
the nationally recommended maximum. This increase
could be due to the measurement site being close
to the A272 East/West route on which traffic
increased slightly. Also this air pollution
count should be treated with caution because
only one counter was used.
Noise levels, have been reported as reducing
significantly by household survey respondents
living close to the High Street and its peripheral
roads. Small improvements have also been noted
around the rail station, elsewhere in the village.
As would be expected, respondents living close
to the bypass have reported worsening traffic
noise, as have the small number of households
in the new housing study area with experience
of conditions prior to the bypass.
Figure 2: Traffic and air pollution changes
and perceived noise reduction
Chart 1 shows household survey perceptions
of noise changes, alongside those for changes
in traffic and air pollution. Perceptions of
traffic changes match the count information;
meanwhile, perceptions of air quality show a
marked improvement along the High Street, in
contrast to the carbon monoxide counts (which
only represent one aspect of air pollution).
Chart 1: Net satisfaction that traffic, nosie
and air pollution improved after the bypass
opened
(N.B. *New housing area responses less than
20)
6 Impact on local economy and accessibility
Preliminary analyses indicate a mixed picture
regarding the impact of the bypass on a range
of factors affecting the attractiveness of the
village centre, as shown in Chart 2. Most respondents
from the on-street survey did not notice any
significant changes after the bypass opened
in the appearance of the High Street, the attractiveness
of shops to customers, access by foot and access
by car. It is only with respect to road safety
that the majority perceived an impact. Of the
people noticing change, there was a net satisfaction
that all the former aspects had improved apart
from the ability of shops to attract customers.
The largest improvement was for road safety
(+51%). Although, the indicator for change in
the attractiveness of shops shows a small negative
change, it should be noted that current net
satisfaction levels are also relatively low
(at +37%). Similar perceptions were also recorded
in the household survey.
Chart 2: On-street survey results for the impact
of the bypass on the centre of Billingshurst
Evidence from local economic counts of businesses
and employment in the village is shown in Chart
3 and Chart 4, respectively. The number of businesses
in Billingshurst Ward has continued to rise
faster than numbers in Horsham District and
in the South East Region. However, this growth
is not reflected in the retail and hotel/restaurant
sectors. Despite the rise in the number of businesses,
the amount of employment in the ward has dipped
due, to the growth in small businesses at the
expense of larger employers.
Chart 3: Ward-level business counts in Billingshurst
Chart 4: Ward-level employment counts in Billingshurst
A summary of some the results from the business
survey is shown in Chart 5 and confirm this
mixed picture, in which the bypass has contributed
to small changes. The business survey sample
comprised, in the main, businesses from the
retail and hotel/restaurant sectors. Of those
that perceived change, more reported that customer
numbers decreased than increased, while conversely
more reported that turnover increased than decreased.
This might reflect a drop in passing trade,
where people stop for small items such as newspapers,
but indicate that businesses have maintained
trade for larger items, for which people are
prepared to make a special trip to the village
centre.
Chart 5: Impacts of the Billingshurst bypass
on business
So far, the analysis has not taken take into
account the size of changes in customer numbers
and turnover, which will be studied in subsequent
stages. However, in agreement with the on-street
survey, the majority of respondents did not
notice any change after the bypass opened.
7 Wider quality of life impacts
Chart 6 shows evidence from the household survey
for the wider quality of life impacts in the
local study areas, except the new housing area
where the sample is small. In the area close
to the High Street, net percentages of respondents
reported noticing improvements in the ‘neighbourhood
as a place to live’ and in road safety; but
they noticed worsening street cleanliness and
antisocial behaviour. Although many respondents
did not notice changes at all, the proportions
noticing change are considerably greater than
for changes in the aspects of local economy
in Chart 2, except for street cleanliness. Therefore,
there is evidence, in the short term at least,
that the bypass has contributed more significantly
to changing wider quality of life issues than
to the local economy and accessibility.
Chart 6: Impacts of the bypass on wider quality
of life issues by study area
Near to the bypass, more people perceived that
quality of life aspects had deteriorated, except
for road safety. There is also evidence that
the bypass has made a significant contribution
to worsening overall neighbourhood conditions
and anti-social behaviour problems, based on
the numbers noticing change. On the peripheral
roads and around the rail station, as could
be expected, changes are not as pronounced.
In subsequent analyses, some of information
from the Billingshurst surveys should be able
to be compared against findings from other surveys
conducted in the District and in West Sussex
County. This will show how changes in quality
of life being perceived in Billingshurst compare
with those elsewhere in the region.
Comments to open questions in the household
survey have also been analysed to further explore
the importance of these quality of life issues
and to identify other issues. In the analysis,
comments were weighted so only one comment has
been recorded for each of the respondents in
each of the categories. Thus, a respondent that
writes many separate comments on crime problems,
for example, is only recorded once.
A summary of comments is shown in Chart 7.
In agreement with other evidence, crime and
fear of crime represent the most significant
set of concerns, but respondents are also worried
by lack of local facilities and recent housing
growth. There were less comments on transport
problems, though, still a significant number.
Chart 7: Summary of comments
This evidence shows that the contribution of
the package of transport measures to improving
quality of life in Billingshurst needs to be
set against other issues; in particular, housing
growth, which is known to be increasing at a
faster rate in Billingshurst than elsewhere.
It is hoped that these issues can be more thoroughly
explored, following the successful implementation
of the remaining parts of the transport package
and after another round of the Civilising Cities
surveys.
Acknowledgement
The household, on-street and business surveys
were part-funded by a grant from the Rees Jeffreys
Road Fund, which we gratefully acknowledge.
|